The program is not compatible with other installed applications.These are the main reasons why PC Tools Performance Toolkit is uninstalled by users: Some experience issues during uninstallation, whereas other encounter problems after the program is removed. It seems that there are many users who have difficulty uninstalling programs like PC Tools Performance Toolkit from their systems. What usually makes people to uninstall PC Tools Performance Toolkit This guide will provide you with detailed instructions and all the information that you require to remove and uninstall I will post that image later when I can.PC Tools Performance Toolkit helps you speed up the PC and optimize its performance, as well as help protect your privacy.Īre you having trouble uninstalling PC Tools Performance Toolkit?Īre you looking for a solution that will completely uninstall and remove all of its files from your computer? I have an image of the problem but I am getting the forum error about link submission and my account needing verified. Two dev machines and a clean install machine too. You guess it and I still get invisible paths. I used this profile to capture my ETL file from the HoloLens 2. The only thing I installed was the Windows Performance Toolkit from here: For fun I re formatted my test machine and reinstalled windows with the latest update assistant May 2020. To be sure I have a test machine that is not a dev machine. Windows Pro 3 Build 18363 Using the same SDK on Unity 2019.2.21 I tried this on two machines with my current build setup for the HoloLens2. I can set the path and the path is defined as the dialog will open again with the check marks. When I open the Configure Symbols dialog box and set the symbol paths the path names are not visible. Again i am talking about this policy: IrqPolicyAllProcessorsInMachine. I could just assign single CPU core for USBXHCI.sys to handle interrupts, but i read this policy selects automatically core with least load. Except if interrupt was in queue waiting for other interrupts to finish. Also it doesn't make sense when interrupt occur, that 0 cores would be handling it. 1 is showing when i switch out of start to end selection and select a single interrupt, at least i think it is single interrupt, that is when i point cursor anywhere But i read it is sorted by 0 based index, that would mean 1 means 2 cores. I found some page concerning View Editor, but there is not enough documentation, i was unable to find exactly if this is related Than i checked any point on the graph and there is everywhere under Selection\Max of CPU either 0 or 1. Clicked cog wheel on top of the graph, selected CPU and from I opened performance analyzer and than Computation\"DPC/ISR Duration by Module, Function *" selected my driver USBXHCI.sys. But i have good results using this policy so far.ĮDIT: i think i found it, please correct me if i am wrong. I read it is not good idea to assign interrupts to all cpu cores, as it can cause cache miss. So i don't know what is true and what not. But on Microsoft docs i read, that this policy willĪssign interrupts to all cores in machine. I read, that this interrupt affinity policy - "IrqPolicyAllProcessorsInMachine" cause driver to be handled on single core at the time, which has lowest priority aka core with least interrupts being processed on it at the time. I am new to WPT, i am not sure where i can see this. I am interested in finding out, whether DPC from driver USBXHCI.SYS are handled on a single core at the time, or on multiple cores.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |